Last year Minnesota finally laid the groundwork to eliminate shotgun-only deer hunting zones. 2026 will be the first year deer hunters in the southern half of she state will be able to use rifles to hunt deer. This has a lot of fudds bent out of shape for no reason.
If you spend much time online (which I recommend against), over time you'll learn that everything you use is bad. But is it really bad or are people just saying that because that's the current trend?
I feel like a broken record whenever I discuss this topic. But seeing another mass shooting in Australia, a land with stringent gun restrictions, warrants repeating the fact that gun restrictions do not work.
You need to try a handgun to ensure it fits you before you buy it, right? That piece of advice has become holy writ in some parts of the shooting community. I don't think this advice is as valuable as many believe.
Max Headroom first aired in 1987. This shows, which took place '20 minutes into the future,' ended up being surprisingly prescient. One episode dealt with the idea of creating AI versions of dead relatives. Today we're living that episode.
Is the new 6.8x51mm superior to the 5.56x45mm? Is .45 Auto superior to 9mm Luger? Should smart tactical operators adopt the latest 6mm wundercartridge? Does any of this actually matter?
In this post I share my six month saga with Smith and Wesson. Through this saga I learned that Smith and Wesson, a company I once held in high regard, is utterly incompetent and dishonest.
The United States Army is trying to replace the venerable M4 as the standard infantry rifle. A recent report regarding the M4's successor, the XM7, shows that everything old is new again.
Should I carry a revolver or a semi-auto? Should I use 9mm or .45? Should I use standard or +p ammo? These questions get asked frequently, but they're likely the least of your self-defense concerns.